3 differences that define the choice for LATAM
VU's strategic positioning
VU is the only platform that covers the full digital identity lifecycle in a single platform: Onboarding + CIAM + Enterprise MFA + Fraud Prevention. FaceTec is a technology SDK specialized only in 3D liveness and matching. It is not a full platform, but a component.
Predictable pricing model
By unifying 4 capabilities in one platform, VU eliminates the cost of licensing, integrating, and maintaining 3 or 4 different vendors: IDV + CIAM + MFA + Fraud. With FaceTec, the SDK price is only the beginning. The real cost includes months of internal development to build the UI, backend, CIAM, fraud prevention, and integrations, making it the more expensive and slower option in the long term.
Technical parity, strategic difference
iBeta Level 2 certification is a standard that both VU and FaceTec meet. The difference is not the certificate. The difference is that VU is a platform where liveness is integrated with government validation, CIAM, MFA, and fraud prevention, while FaceTec is only a component that requires internal development to become a functional system.
VU ONE vs FaceTec: Full Comparison Table
Below, we present a table with differentiators for financial services, government, and gaming companies operating in Argentina, Chile, Colombia, and Brazil.
Quantifiable VU ONE advantage over FaceTec
The following indicators reflect the operational impact of an identity verification platform built for LATAM versus a global platform adapted to the region. Biometric accuracy data corresponds to the 2025 iBeta certificate.
Technical analysis by capability: CIAM, MFA, fraud prevention, and LATAM support
When comparing companies, the decision often focuses on certifications that validate high security standards. But in the comparison between VU ONE and FaceTec, other factors become critical: the ability to cover the full authentication lifecycle and local presence in LATAM. Both are absent in FaceTec. Below, we present the technical analysis of each area for product, compliance, and technology teams evaluating both options.
When FaceTec is enough
FaceTec is viable only if the project is 100% focused on liveness and you have your own development team. In other words:
- You only need liveness verification and biometric matching, without requiring document KYC, CIAM, MFA, or fraud prevention.
- You have an internal development team, or budget for integrators, to build the UI, backend, integrations, and full flow.
- Your project has a 12 to 24 month development horizon, assuming time-to-market is not critical.
- Integration with LATAM government registries is not required.

