3 differences that define the choice for LATAM
Certified biometrics
VU ONE has iBeta Level 2 (ISO/IEC 30107-3) certification, which can be presented to central banks and regulators. Yoti has iBeta Level 3 certification, but its niche is highly specific: age assurance in the UK/EU.
Regional data sovereignty
VU ONE can be deployed as SaaS, On-Premise, or Hybrid. The client chooses where its data lives. Yoti is mainly a mobile digital identity app for end users, not an enterprise B2B platform.
Platform without loose components
VU ONE is a unified platform: Onboarding + CIAM + Enterprise MFA + Transactional Fraud Prevention + AML. Yoti offers a digital ID app for individual users, not a corporate identity management platform.
VU ONE vs Yoti: Full Comparison Table
Below, we present a table with differentiators for financial services, government, and gaming companies operating in Argentina, Chile, Colombia, and Brazil.
Quantifiable VU ONE advantage over Yoti
The following indicators reflect the operational impact of an identity verification platform built for LATAM versus a global platform adapted to the region. Biometric accuracy data corresponds to the 2025 iBeta certificate.
Technical analysis by capability: CIAM, MFA, fraud prevention, and LATAM support
Yoti is a leader in Digital ID Wallets and age verification, but its niche is limited. It also operates almost exclusively in the UK and EU. Given these limitations, VU ONE becomes a natural choice for LATAM. Below, we present the technical analysis of each area for product, compliance, and technology teams evaluating both options.
When Yoti is a valid option
VU ONE is built for companies with real operations in LATAM and active regulatory requirements. If your use case does not fit these parameters, Yoti may be a valid option:
- The market is exclusively the UK or EU, not LATAM.
- The use case is age verification for retail, hospitality, or entertainment, such as a pub verifying legal age.
- Regulated KYC, CIAM, enterprise MFA, or transactional fraud prevention are not required.
- A mobile-first SaaS platform with no on-premise option is acceptable.
- Volume is low or an initial free plan is needed.

